Frequently asked questions

Sifflet is designed to make data quality monitoring scalable and business-aware. It offers automated anomaly detection, real-time alerts, and impact analysis so you can focus on the issues that matter most. With features like data profiling, dynamic thresholding, and low-code setup, Sifflet empowers both technical and non-technical users to maintain high data reliability across complex pipelines. It's a great fit for modern data teams looking to reduce manual effort and improve trust in their data.

Data quality management works best when it's a shared responsibility. Data stewards often lead the charge by bridging business needs with technical implementation. Governance teams define standards and policies, engineering teams build the monitoring infrastructure, and business users provide critical domain expertise. This cross-functional collaboration ensures that quality issues are caught early and resolved in ways that truly support business outcomes.

That's a great distinction to understand! Technical data quality focuses on things like accuracy, completeness, and consistency—basically, whether the data is structurally sound. Business data quality, on the other hand, asks if the data actually supports how your organization defines success. For example, a report might be technically correct but still misleading if it doesn’t reflect your current business model. A strong data governance framework helps align both dimensions.

Data observability plays a key role by giving teams real-time visibility into the health of their data pipelines. With observability tools like Sifflet, you can monitor data freshness, detect anomalies, and trace issues back to their root cause. This allows you to catch and fix data quality issues before they impact business decisions, making your data more reliable and your operations more efficient.

Great question! Data quality management helps ensure that your data remains accurate, complete, and aligned with business goals as your organization scales. Without strong data quality practices, teams waste time troubleshooting issues, decision-makers lose trust in reports, and systems make poor choices. With proper data quality monitoring in place, you can move faster, automate confidently, and build a competitive edge.

Agentic observability is our vision for the future — where observability platforms don’t just monitor, they act. Think of it as moving from real-time alerts to intelligent copilots. With features like auto-remediation, dynamic thresholding, and incident response automation, Sifflet is building systems that can detect issues, assess impact, and even resolve known problems on their own. It’s a huge step toward self-healing pipelines and truly proactive data operations.

Root cause analysis is a critical part of data reliability, and we’re making it smarter. Instead of manually sifting through logs or lineage graphs, Sifflet uses AI and metadata to automate root cause detection and suggest next steps. Our observability tools analyze query logs, pipeline dependencies, and usage patterns to surface the 'why' behind incidents — not just the 'what.' That means faster triage, quicker resolution, and fewer surprises downstream.

Business-aware observability bridges the gap between technical issues and real-world outcomes. It’s not just about detecting schema changes or data drift — it’s about understanding how those issues affect KPIs, dashboards, and decisions. At Sifflet, we bring together telemetry instrumentation, data profiling, and business context so teams can prioritize incidents based on impact, not just severity. This empowers everyone, from data engineers to product managers, to trust and act on data with confidence.

We hear this a lot — too many alerts, not enough clarity. At Sifflet, we focus on intelligent alerting by combining metadata, data lineage tracking, and usage patterns to prioritize what really matters. Instead of just flagging that something broke, our platform tells you who’s affected, why it matters, and how to fix it. That means fewer false positives and more actionable insights, helping you cut through the noise and focus on what truly impacts your business.

Great question! The old playbook for data observability focused heavily on technical infrastructure and treated data like servers — if the pipeline ran and the schema looked fine, the data was assumed to be trustworthy. But today, data is a strategic asset that powers business decisions, AI models, and customer experiences. At Sifflet, we believe modern observability platforms must go beyond uptime and freshness checks to provide context-aware insights that reflect real business impact.

To manage a data catalog effectively, assign clear ownership through data stewards, enforce consistent naming conventions, and schedule regular metadata reviews. For even more impact, connect it with your observability platform to monitor data quality and lineage in real time, ensuring your catalog stays accurate and actionable.

When integrated with observability tools, a data catalog becomes more than documentation. It provides real-time metrics, data freshness checks, and anomaly detection, allowing teams to proactively monitor pipeline health and quickly respond to issues. This integration enables faster root cause analysis and more reliable data delivery.

Modern data catalogs capture four key types of metadata: technical (schemas, formats), business (definitions, KPIs), operational (usage patterns, SLA compliance), and governance (access controls, data classifications). These layers work together to support data quality monitoring and transparency in data pipelines.

A well-managed data catalog enhances data reliability by capturing metadata like data lineage, ownership, and quality indicators. It supports data governance by enforcing access controls and documenting compliance requirements, making it easier to meet regulatory standards and ensure trustworthy analytics across the organization.

A data catalog is critical because it helps teams find, understand, and trust their data. It centralizes metadata, making data assets searchable and understandable, which reduces duplication, speeds up analytics, and supports data governance. When paired with data observability tools, it becomes a powerful foundation for proactive data management.

Sifflet simplifies data volume monitoring with plug-and-play integrations, AI-powered baselining, and unified observability dashboards. It automatically detects anomalies, connects them to business impact, and provides real-time alerts. Whether you're using Snowflake, BigQuery, or Kafka, Sifflet helps you stay ahead of data reliability issues with proactive monitoring and alerting.

Data lineage tracking is essential for root cause analysis when volume anomalies occur. It helps you trace where data came from and how it's been transformed, so if a volume drop happens, you can quickly identify whether it was caused by a failed API, upstream filter, or schema change. This context is key for effective data pipeline monitoring.

Great question! Data volume is about how much data you're receiving, while data variety refers to the different types and formats of data sources. For example, a sudden drop in appointment data is a volume issue, while a new file format causing schema mismatches is a variety issue. Observability tools help you monitor both dimensions to maintain healthy pipelines.

Data observability provides visibility into your pipelines by tracking key metrics like row counts, duplicates, and ingestion patterns. It acts as an early warning system, helping teams catch volume anomalies before they affect dashboards or ML models. By using a robust observability platform, you can ensure that your data is consistently complete and trustworthy.

Data volume refers to the quantity of data flowing through your pipelines. Monitoring it is critical because sudden drops, spikes, or duplicates can quietly break downstream logic and lead to incomplete analysis or compliance risks. With proper data volume monitoring in place, you can catch these anomalies early and ensure data reliability across your organization.

Great distinction! Data distribution shows you how values are spread across a dataset, while data lineage tracking helps you trace where that data came from and how it’s moved through your pipeline. Both are essential for root cause analysis, but they solve different parts of the puzzle in a robust observability platform.

Sifflet makes distribution monitoring easy by using statistical profiling to learn what 'normal' looks like in your data. It then alerts you when patterns drift from those baselines. This helps you maintain SLA compliance and avoid surprises in dashboards or ML models. Plus, it's all automated within our data observability platform so you can focus on solving problems, not just finding them.

Some red flags include missing categories, unusual clustering of values, unexpected outliers, or uneven splits that don’t align with business logic. These issues often sneak past volume or schema checks, which is why proactive data quality monitoring and data profiling are so important for catching them early.

When data distribution shifts unexpectedly, it can throw off the assumptions your ML models are trained on. For example, if a new payment processor causes 70% of transactions to fall under $5, a fraud detection model might start flagging legitimate behavior as suspicious. That's why real-time metrics and anomaly detection are so crucial for ML model monitoring within a good data observability framework.

Great question! Data distribution gives you insight into the shape and spread of your data values, which traditional monitoring tools often miss. While volume, schema, and freshness checks tell you if the data is present and structured correctly, distribution monitoring helps you catch hidden issues like skewed categories or outlier spikes. It's a key component of any modern observability platform focused on data reliability.

Absolutely. When schema changes go undetected, they can cause delays, errors, or data loss that violate your SLA commitments. Real-time metrics and schema monitoring are essential for maintaining SLA compliance and keeping your analytics pipeline observability strong.

Schema evolution can introduce unexpected fields or data type changes that disrupt both batch and streaming data workflows. With proper data pipeline monitoring and observability tools, you can track these changes in real time and ensure your systems adapt without losing data quality or breaking downstream processes.

You can prevent schema-related breakages by using data observability tools that offer real-time schema drift detection and alerting. These tools help you catch changes early, validate against data contracts, and maintain SLA compliance across your data pipelines.

Great question! A data schema defines structure across your entire data ecosystem, including pipelines, APIs, and ingestion tools. A database schema, on the other hand, is specific to one system, like PostgreSQL or BigQuery, and focuses on tables, columns, and relationships. Both are essential for effective data governance and observability.

Schema monitoring helps catch unexpected changes in your data structure before they break downstream systems like dashboards or ML models. It's a core capability in any modern observability platform because it ensures data reliability and prevents silent failures in your pipelines.

When evaluating observability tools, consider factors like ease of setup, support for real-time metrics, data freshness checks, and integration with your existing stack. Look for platforms that offer strong data pipeline monitoring, business context in alerts, and cost transparency. Tools like Sifflet also provide fast time-to-value and support for both batch and streaming data observability.

Yes, Sifflet is designed to be accessible for both business stakeholders and data engineers. It offers intuitive interfaces for no-code monitor creation, context-rich alerts, and field-level data lineage tracking. This democratizes data quality monitoring and helps teams across the organization stay aligned on data health and pipeline performance.

Sifflet supports SLA compliance by offering intelligent alerting, dynamic thresholding, and real-time dashboards that track incident metrics and resolution times. Its data reliability dashboard gives teams visibility into SLA adherence and helps prioritize issues based on business impact, streamlining incident management workflows and reducing mean time to resolution.

Many teams are looking for more flexible and cost-efficient observability tools that offer better business user access and faster implementation. Monte Carlo, while a pioneer, has become known for its high costs, limited customization, and lack of business context in alerts. Newer platforms like Sifflet and Metaplane focus on real-time metrics, cross-functional collaboration, and easier setup, making them more appealing for modern data teams.

Sifflet stands out as a modern data observability platform that combines AI-powered monitoring with business context. Unlike Monte Carlo, Sifflet offers no-code monitor creation, dynamic alerting with impact insights, and real-time data lineage tracking. It's designed for both technical and business users, making it easier for teams to collaborate and maintain data reliability across the organization.

A great distinction! Storage platforms hold your actual data, while a data catalog helps you understand what that data means. Sifflet connects both, so when we detect an anomaly, the catalog tells you what business process is affected and who should be notified. It’s how we turn raw telemetry into actionable insights for better incident response automation and SLA compliance.

Observability platforms like Sifflet support compliance monitoring by tracking who accessed what data, when, and how. We help teams meet GDPR, NERC CIP, and other regulatory requirements through audit logging, data governance tools, and lineage visibility. It’s all about making sure your data is not just stored safely but also traceable and verifiable.

Data lineage tracking is essential for understanding how data flows from storage to dashboards. When something breaks, Sifflet helps you trace it back to the storage layer, whether it's a corrupted file in S3 or a schema drift in MongoDB. This visibility is critical for root cause analysis and ensuring data reliability across your pipelines.

Modern platforms like Snowflake and Amazon S3 expose rich metadata and access patterns that observability tools can monitor. For example, Sifflet integrates with Snowflake to track schema changes, data freshness, and query patterns, while S3 integration enables us to monitor ingestion latency and file structure changes. These capabilities are key for real-time metrics and data quality monitoring.

Great question! Data storage is the foundation of any data observability strategy. Without reliable storage, you can't trust the data you're monitoring or trace issues back to their source. At Sifflet, we believe observability starts with making sure your data is stored correctly, consistently, and accessibly. That way, your alerts, dashboards, and root cause analysis are built on solid ground.

Yes, it’s designed to fit right in. Sifflet connects to your existing data stack via APIs and supports integrations with tools like Slack, Jira, and Microsoft Teams. It also enables 'Quality-as-Code' for teams using infrastructure-as-code, making it a seamless addition to your DataOps best practices.

Sifflet is built to scale. It supports automated data quality monitoring across hundreds of assets, as seen with Carrefour Links monitoring over 800 data assets in 8+ countries. With dynamic thresholding, schema change detection, and real-time metrics, Sifflet ensures SLA compliance and consistent data reliability across complex ecosystems.

Absolutely! Sifflet’s field-level data lineage tracking lets you trace data issues from BI dashboards all the way back to source systems. Its AI agent, Sage, even recalls past incidents to suggest likely causes, making root cause analysis faster and more accurate for data engineers and analysts alike.

Sifflet stands out by offering a unified observability platform that combines data cataloging, monitoring, and data lineage tracking in one place. Unlike tools that focus only on anomaly detection or technical metrics, Sifflet brings in business context, empowering both technical and non-technical users to collaborate and ensure data reliability at scale.

Great question! Sifflet tackles alert fatigue by using AI-native monitoring that understands business context. Instead of flooding teams with false positives, it prioritizes alerts based on downstream impact. This means your team focuses on real issues, improving trust in your observability tools and saving valuable engineering time.

Data observability gives you the visibility to detect freshness problems before they impact the business. By combining metrics like data age, expected vs. actual arrival time, and pipeline health dashboards, observability tools help teams catch delays early, trace where things broke down, and maintain trust in real-time metrics.

You can use a mix of threshold-based alerts, machine learning for anomaly detection, and visual freshness indicators in your BI tools. Pair these with data lineage tracking and root cause analysis to catch and resolve issues quickly. A modern data observability platform like Sifflet makes it easy to set up proactive monitoring tailored to your business needs.

Freshness issues often start with delays in source systems, ingestion bottlenecks, slow transformation jobs, or even caching problems in dashboards. That's why a strong observability platform needs to monitor every stage of the pipeline, from ingestion latency to delivery, to ensure data reliability and timely decision-making.

Great question! While these terms are often used interchangeably, they each mean something different. Data freshness is about how up-to-date your data is. Latency measures the delay from data generation to availability, and timeliness refers to whether that data arrives within expected time windows. Understanding these differences is key to effective data pipeline monitoring and SLA compliance.

Data freshness refers to how current your data is relative to the real-world events it's meant to represent. In data observability, it's one of the most critical metrics because even accurate data can lead to poor decisions if it's outdated. Whether you're monitoring financial trades or patient records, stale data can have serious business consequences.

A metadata control plane brings together technical metrics and business context by leveraging metadata across your stack. This enables better decision-making, reduces alert fatigue, and supports SLA compliance by giving teams a single source of truth for pipeline health and data reliability.

Sifflet uses AI-powered dynamic monitors and data validation rules to automate data quality monitoring across your pipelines. It also integrates with tools like Snowflake and dbt to ensure data freshness checks and schema validations are embedded into your workflows without manual overhead.

If your team has a narrow focus on anomaly detection or prefers a SQL-first, hands-on approach to monitoring, tools like Anomalo or Bigeye can be great fits. However, for broader needs like data governance, business impact analysis, and cross-functional collaboration, a platform like Sifflet offers more comprehensive data observability.

Sifflet provides advanced root cause analysis through complete data lineage and AI-powered anomaly detection. This means teams can quickly trace issues across pipelines and transformations, assess business impact, and resolve incidents faster with smart, context-aware alerts.

Sifflet stands out as a metadata control plane that connects technical reliability with business context. Unlike point solutions, it offers AI-native automation, full data lineage tracking, and cross-functional accessibility, making it ideal for organizations that need to scale trust in their data across teams.

A Trust OS is an intelligent metadata layer where data contracts are enriched with real-time observability signals. It combines lineage awareness, semantic context, and predictive validation to ensure data reliability at scale. This approach elevates data governance by embedding trust directly into the technical fabric of your data pipelines, not just documentation.

Absolutely. AI systems need more than just schemas—they need context. Observability platforms like Sifflet provide machine-readable trust signals, data freshness checks, and reliability scores through APIs. This allows autonomous agents to assess data quality in real time and make smarter decisions without relying on outdated documentation.

Anomaly detection helps identify unexpected changes in data that might signal contract violations or semantic drift. By integrating predictive analytics monitoring and dynamic thresholding into your observability platform, you can catch issues before they break dashboards or compromise AI models. It’s a core feature of a resilient, intelligent metadata layer.

Data observability adds critical context that static contracts lack, such as data lineage tracking, real-time usage patterns, and anomaly detection. With observability tools, teams can proactively monitor contract compliance, detect schema drift early, and ensure SLA compliance before issues impact downstream systems. It transforms contracts from documentation into enforceable, living agreements.

Traditional data contracts struggle because they’re static by nature, while modern data systems are constantly evolving. As AI and real-time workloads become more common, these contracts can’t keep up with schema changes, data drift, or business logic updates. That’s why many teams are turning to data observability platforms like Sifflet to bring context, real-time metrics, and trust into the equation.

To ensure high data quality during transformation, start with strong data profiling and cleaning steps, then use mapping and validation rules to align with business logic. Incorporating data lineage tracking and anomaly detection also helps maintain integrity. Observability tools like Sifflet make it easier to enforce these practices and continuously monitor for data drift or schema changes that could affect your pipeline.

Monitoring transformation errors is key to maintaining healthy pipelines. Using a data observability platform allows you to implement real-time alerts, root cause analysis, and data validation rules. These features help catch issues early, reduce error propagation, and ensure that your analytics and business decisions are based on trustworthy data.

Apache Spark and dbt are powerful tools for managing different aspects of data transformation. Spark is great for large-scale, distributed processing, especially when working with complex transformations and high data volumes. dbt, on the other hand, brings software engineering best practices to SQL-based transformations, making it ideal for analytics engineering. Both tools benefit from integration with observability platforms to ensure transformation pipelines run smoothly and reliably.

Data transformation directly influences SLA compliance and data reliability by ensuring that the data delivered to business users is accurate, timely, and consistent. With proper data quality monitoring in place, organizations can meet service level agreements and maintain trust in their analytics outputs. Observability tools help track these metrics in real time and alert teams when issues arise.

Great question! Data observability is essential for transformation pipelines because it gives teams visibility into data quality, pipeline performance, and transformation accuracy. Without it, errors can go unnoticed and create downstream issues in analytics and reporting. With a solid observability platform, you can detect anomalies, track data freshness, and ensure your transformations are aligned with business goals.

Popular ingestion tools like Fivetran, Stitch, and Apache Kafka integrate well with cloud data observability platforms. They offer strong support for telemetry instrumentation, real-time ingestion, and schema registry integration. Pairing them with observability tools ensures your data stays reliable and actionable across your entire stack.

To keep your ingestion pipelines healthy, it's best to use observability tools that offer features like pipeline health dashboards, data quality monitoring, and anomaly detection. These tools provide visibility into data flow, alert you to schema drift, and help with root cause analysis when issues arise.

Batch ingestion processes data in chunks at scheduled intervals, making it ideal for non-urgent tasks like overnight reporting. Real-time ingestion, on the other hand, handles streaming data as it arrives, which is perfect for use cases like fraud detection or live dashboards. If you're focused on streaming data monitoring or real-time alerts, real-time ingestion is the way to go.

Great question! Data ingestion is where observability starts. Once data enters your system, observability platforms like Sifflet help monitor its quality, detect anomalies, and ensure data freshness. This allows teams to catch ingestion issues early, maintain SLA compliance, and build trust in their data pipelines.

Data ingestion is the process of collecting and loading data from various sources into a central system like a data lake or warehouse. It's the first step in your data pipeline and is critical for enabling real-time metrics, analytics, and operational decision-making. Without reliable ingestion, your downstream analytics and data observability efforts can quickly fall apart.

Silent failures are tricky, but with the right data observability tools, you can catch them early. Look for platforms that support real-time alerts, schema registry integration, and dynamic thresholding. These features help you monitor for unexpected changes, missing data, or drift in your pipelines. Sifflet, for example, offers anomaly detection and root cause analysis that help you uncover and fix issues before they impact your business.

Not quite. While data quality monitoring helps ensure individual datasets are accurate and consistent, data reliability goes further by ensuring your entire data system is dependable over time. That includes pipeline orchestration visibility, anomaly detection, and proactive monitoring. Pairing data quality with a robust observability platform gives you a more comprehensive approach to reliability.

To stay on top of SLA compliance, it's important to define clear service level objectives (SLOs), monitor data freshness checks, and set up real-time alerts for anomalies. Tools that support automated incident response and pipeline health dashboards can help you detect and resolve issues quickly. At Sifflet, we recommend integrating observability tools that align both technical and business metrics to maintain trust in your data.

Data observability gives you end-to-end visibility into your data pipelines, helping you catch issues like schema changes, data drift, or ingestion failures before they impact downstream systems. By continuously monitoring real-time metrics and enabling root cause analysis, observability platforms like Sifflet ensure your data stays accurate, complete, and up-to-date, which directly supports stronger data reliability.

Great question! AI and ML systems rely on massive volumes of data to make decisions, and any flaw in that data gets amplified at scale. Data reliability ensures that your models are trained and operate on accurate, complete, and timely data. Without it, you risk cascading failures, poor predictions, and even regulatory issues. That’s why data observability is essential to proactively monitor and maintain reliability across your pipelines.

Absolutely! By clearly mapping upstream and downstream table relationships, SQL Table Tracer helps teams quickly trace issues back to their source. This accelerates root cause analysis and supports faster, more effective incident response workflows in any observability platform.

STT is designed to be lightweight, extensible, and accurate. It supports complex SQL features like CTEs and subqueries using a composable, monoid-based design. This makes it ideal for integrating into larger observability tools, ensuring reliable data lineage tracking and SLA compliance.

SQL Table Tracer uses Antlr4 with semantic predicates to support multiple SQL dialects like Snowflake, Redshift, and PostgreSQL. This flexible parsing approach ensures accurate lineage extraction across diverse environments, which is essential for data pipeline monitoring and distributed systems observability.

Table-level lineage helps teams perform impact analysis, debug broken pipelines, and meet compliance standards by clearly showing how data flows between systems. It's foundational for data quality monitoring and root cause analysis in modern observability platforms.

SQL Table Tracer (STT) is a lightweight library that automatically extracts table-level lineage from SQL queries. It identifies both destination and upstream tables, making it easier to understand data dependencies and build reliable data lineage workflows. This is a key component of any effective data observability strategy.

MCP enables LLMs to access structured context like schema changes, validation rules, and logs, making it easier to detect and explain data quality issues. With tool calls and memory, agents can continuously monitor pipelines and proactively alert teams when data quality deteriorates. This supports better SLA compliance and more reliable data operations.

At Sifflet, we’re leveraging MCP to build agents that can observe, decide, and act across distributed systems. By injecting telemetry data, user context, and pipeline metadata as structured resources, our agents can navigate complex environments and improve distributed systems observability in a scalable and modular way.

Absolutely! MCP allows LLMs to remember past interactions and call diagnostic tools, which is a game-changer for data pipeline monitoring. It supports multi-turn conversations and structured tool use, making incident response faster and more contextual. This means less time spent digging through logs and more time resolving issues efficiently.

MCP empowers LLMs to use structured inputs like logs and pipeline metadata, making it easier to trace issues across multiple steps. This structured interaction helps streamline root cause analysis, especially in complex environments where traditional observability tools might fall short. At Sifflet, we’re integrating MCP to enhance how our platform surfaces and explains data incidents.

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a new interface standard developed by Anthropic that allows large language models (LLMs) to interact with tools, retain memory, and access external context. At Sifflet, we're excited about MCP because it enables more intelligent agents that can help with data observability by diagnosing issues, triggering remediation tools, and maintaining context across long-running investigations.

Yes, it is! Sifflet currently supports Data Sharing to Snowflake, BigQuery, and S3, with more destinations on the way. This makes it easy to integrate Sifflet into your cloud data observability strategy and leverage your existing infrastructure for deeper insights and proactive monitoring.

The data shared through Sifflet's optimized pipeline is refreshed every four hours. This ensures you always have timely and accurate insights for data quality monitoring, anomaly detection, and root cause analysis within your own platform.

Sifflet helps you identify underused or orphaned data assets through lineage and usage metadata. By analyzing this data, you can make informed decisions about deprecating unused tables or enhancing monitoring for critical pipelines. It's a smart way to improve pipeline resilience and reduce unnecessary costs in your data ecosystem.

Absolutely! With Sifflet's Data Sharing, you can connect your favorite BI tools like Looker, Tableau, or Power BI to our shared tables. This lets you build tailored dashboards and reports using real-time metrics from your observability data, helping you track KPIs, monitor SLA compliance, and visualize trends across teams or domains.

Great question! Sifflet's Data Sharing provides access to rich metadata about your data assets, including tags, owners, and monitor configurations. By making this available in your own data warehouse, you can set up automated checks to ensure compliance with your governance standards. It's a powerful way to implement scalable data governance and reduce manual audits using our observability platform.

One standout example is their ad inventory forecasting tool. By embedding real-time metrics into internal tools, sales teams can plan campaigns more precisely and avoid last-minute scrambles. It’s a great case of using data to improve both accuracy and efficiency.

They’ve implemented a full enablement program with starter kits, trainings, and office hours to build data literacy and trust. Observability tools are just one part of the equation; the real focus is on enabling confident, autonomous decision-making across the organization.

Dailymotion emphasized that high-quality, well-documented, and observable data is essential for AI readiness. Data quality monitoring ensures that AI systems are trained on accurate and reliable inputs, which is critical for producing trustworthy outcomes.

By rebuilding their pipelines with strong data pipeline monitoring, Dailymotion reduced storage costs, improved performance, and ensured consistent access to delivery data. This helped eliminate data sprawl and created a single source of truth for operational teams.

Dailymotion embedded data observability into their data ecosystem to ensure trust, reliability, and discoverability across teams. This shift allowed them to move from ad hoc data requests to delivering scalable, analytics-driven data products that empower both engineers and business users.

This checklist is for anyone who relies on trustworthy data—from CDOs and analysts to DataOps teams and engineers. Whether you're focused on data governance, anomaly detection, or building resilient pipelines, the checklist gives you a clear path to choosing the right observability tools.

The checklist emphasizes the need for smart alerting, like dynamic thresholding and alert correlation, instead of just flooding your team with notifications. This focus helps reduce alert fatigue and ensures your team only gets notified when it really matters.

A good observability platform should fit right into your current stack. That means supporting tools like dbt, Airflow, and your cloud infrastructure. Seamless integration ensures better pipeline orchestration visibility and makes it easier to act on data issues without disrupting your workflows.

Data observability plays a key role in SLA compliance by detecting issues like ingestion latency, schema changes, or data drift before they impact downstream users. With proper data quality monitoring and real-time metrics, you can catch problems early and keep your dashboards and reports reliable.

Great question! When evaluating a data observability platform, it’s important to focus on real capabilities like root cause analysis, data lineage tracking, and SLA compliance rather than flashy features. Our checklist helps you cut through the noise so you can find a solution that builds trust and scales with your data needs.